SPORT ENGLAND: Active schools

SCHOOL SPORT CO-ORDINATORS

1. PHILOSOPHY AND KEY PRINCIPLES

The purpose of this initiative is to increase sports opportunities for more young people through co-ordinated physical education, school sport and out of school hours learning activities that effectively link with local community sports facilities and development programmes, particularly in areas of disadvantage. It is recognised that schools can play a significant role in neighbourhood renewal and that sport can be particularly effective in addressing disaffection among young people. In accordance with the recommendations of Policy Action Team 10, the support available through this initiative will be flexible and local control over the design and development will be encouraged.

The initiative is based on the following key principles:

2. THE OBJECTIVES

The key objectives for the School Sport Co-ordinators are:

Strategic Planning - to enhance the physical education and sports development strategy for the school with agreed targets and performance measures reviewed each term, as part of the school development plan.

Primary Liaison - to establish and develop linked PE and sports development programmes for local primary and special schools targeting the Key Stage 2/3 interface.

School to Community - to build and support school/club links and ‘education for leisure’ programmes within the school, targeting the 14-16/18 age group.

Out of School Hours Activities - to develop and support out of school hours and intra-mural sport programmes with local clubs, governing bodies of sport, school sports associations and sports development officers. Inter-school competitions will be an integral part of this objective. This will link closely with the out-of-school hours learning (study support) objectives of DfEE.

Coaching and Leadership - to develop leadership, coaching and officiating programmes for senior pupils to gain appropriate skills and qualifications to enhance their future role within the sporting community.

Raising Standards - in addition to the ‘education for leisure’ programme, to support schools in reviewing the current PE and sport programmes in the light of Sportsmark and Activemark requirements.

3. THE OUTCOMES

These are:

leaders and officials within the school, local primary schools and local sports
clubs/facilities. Again, information on the current position will be
needed.

4. OUTPUTS

Strategic Planning

Primary Liaison

School to Community

Out of School Hours Learning Activities

Coaching and Leadership

Raising Standards

  1. ELIGIBILITY AND APPROACH

Applications will be considered from schools, groups of schools or LEAs which meet the following "readiness factors":

In the first phase the preferred model is to create school sports partnerships which embrace a number of identified clusters of primary, special and secondary schools led by LEAs or Specialist Sports Colleges in targeted SAZ/EIC/EAZ areas. It reflects the need for strong local management and effective school based co-ordination between primary and secondary schools and the communities in which they are located. All partnerships will be expected to consider specific work targeting girls, young people with special needs and the promotion of racial equality. Set out below is a suggested structure. This is illustrative in so far as the actual release of teacher time and scheme details will need to be locally determined.

Flexibility would be required in the release of teacher time as it is expected that much of the Co-ordinators work would be undertaken outside of normal school hours.

Thus a typical partnership might consist of one Partnership Development Manager, up to 4 School Sport Co-ordinators and up to 20 Primary Link Teachers. This team of people will drive the work to achieve the objectives set out in Para. 2 working with sports organisations and Local Authority sport and leisure agencies in the local community.

7. OTHER MODELS

In those areas where LEAs and/or Specialist Sport Colleges are not well placed to take on the Partnership Development Manager role and it is not yet appropriate to develop this broader schools sport partnership, School Sport Co-ordinators and primary link teachers may be appointed to a single cluster of schools identified within SAZ/EIC/EAZ areas. Applicants will need to demonstrate appropriate support arrangements for their work, and this might come from HE institutions, Sportsmark/Gold awarded schools or Sports Development Units etc.

Additional projects which feature particularly creative local approaches by local authorities and schools, may also be solicited, always ensuring they meet the agreed objectives of the programme.

All applications will need to demonstrate mechanisms to link a strong local school based management system with school based Co-ordinators and identified personnel within primary/special schools.

8. MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

9. FUNDING AND LOTTERY PROCESS

Initial costings for the delivery of the infrastructure and some related operational costs have been prepared. These are based on the preferred model outlined above and assume a cost of £125 per day for buying-in teacher time. Two options are proposed. The first option envisages the school partnerships receiving funding at 100% for a three year period. The second option envisages a phased reduction in the funding, which is intended in part to prepare partnerships on a more managed basis to develop arrangements to sustain the projects beyond the funding provided by Sport England and NOF. Where the preferred model is not adopted, it is assumed that a similar level of funding will be provided to deliver the infrastructure support for a cluster of schools.

The costings also assume that Lottery funding will be made available for a three year period; and that over the course of the programme, to be delivered on a phased basis, funding will be provided to support work in 600 secondary schools and 2600 primary schools. Any changes to the funding period and /or to the number of schools would need to be reflected in the required funding.

In order to make the process as simple as possible, whilst maintaining appropriate levels of accountability, it is proposed that applications will be solicited from the school or LEA which will host the Partnership Development Manager. Funding will be payable to the school or LEA who in turn will be responsible for making funding available to the cluster schools, as appropriate. Funding will be payable in advance, and Sport England will carry out appropriate compliance and reconciliation checks.

Sport England will be responsible for the monitoring and evaluation of the delivery of the outputs and outcomes through the infrastructure posts, and each cluster will be required to agree to participate in all elementSchool Sport Co-ordinators initiative must be to create a seamless link between physical education, school sport and lifelong participation in the community. s of the monitoring and evaluation programme. Monitoring and evaluation reports will be presented to the management Group and to the Sport England Lottery Panel, and will form part of the information used to assess the continued funding of awards throughout the envisaged funding period.

10. CONCLUSION

The focus of the Research evidence still suggests that bridging the gap between school and community remains one of the main problems for young people particularly in disadvantaged areas. The deployment of up to 600 School Sport Co-ordinators who are school centred but development orientated will be a major step forward in a collective drive to widen access and opportunities for young people across England to realise their full potential.

(Agreed by DfEE/DCMS/NOF and Sport England — 06 April 2000)

(Information provided courtesy of http://www.pelinks4u.org)

Back to PELINKS4U