Site Search
home | naspe forum | submit | pe store | calendar | contact   

APPLICATION OF RESEARCH ON COORDINATION, CONTROL, AND SKILL TO PHYSICAL EDUCATION

by Eric James (homepage) & Phillip Conatser (homepage), The University of Texas at Brownsville & Texas Southmost College

This paper relates classic research on motor control and learning (Kugler, Kelso, & Turvey, 1980, 1982; Newell, 1985) to the needs of practitioners in the field of physical education. Both theoretical and experimental research on motor learning has found that the human neuromuscular system is organized in a particular way so as to meet the difficult biomechanical, task, and environmental challenges in performing sport and exercise activities such as are commonly taught in physical education classes.

Research has shown that the human neuromuscular system meets these demands by using the separate processes of coordination and control to produce skilled action. One important goal of physical education teachers is to facilitate the process of learning skilled movement in their students. To accomplish this, some knowledge about coordination, control, and skill can be helpful.

In motor tasks that involve relatively few segments of the body there are relatively few demands for coordinating the many degrees of freedom of the body. However, in whole-body tasks (i.e., playing basketball, baseball, soccer, etc.), such as are typically learned in physical education classes, the human nervous system is faced with the challenge of how to coordinate the many segments of the human body in a way to optimally meet what can be challenging task demands.

When a basketball player gracefully fakes out an opponent, spins and hits a jump shot, there are precise demands for the coordination of the body in such a way as to pass the defensive player and shoot the ball so as to pass through the hoop. Learning abilities such as this require the ability to coordinate and control the body so as to produce skillful action that will achieve the objective (i.e., making a basket).

Degrees-of-Freedom Problem

A central problem in the control of human movement is how the nervous system can control the many joints, muscles, neurons etc. For example, it can be difficult to simultaneously rub your stomach and pat your head at the same time. Or, performing a polyrhythm of tapping twice with one hand while tapping three times with the other (such as in drumming) is generally difficult to perform without practice.

These examples show the difficulty that can exist in controlling only a couple of small segments of the body. It is an even more challenging proposition to control the human body in sports that involve the entire body and have strong timing and positioning demands. Even with the level of computer technology existing today the movement abilities of which robots are capable is nowhere near the level of skill in movement that humans display.

Coordination
The process of human motor learning essentially consists in learning how to master the many redundant degrees of freedom in the human neuromuscular system so as to optimally meet the task demands in a given set of environmental conditions. The first aspect of this process is that of organizing the coordination between body segments. The nervous system simplifies the control of the neuromuscular system by constraining different parts of the body to work together. This constraining of body segments to act together is performed by coordinative structures, also known as synergies, and is called coordination. This simplification of control is similar to the way the two front wheels of your automobile are constrained to act together. Because of this, you only need control one steering while, rather than two.

Because coordinative structures simplify control the result is that coordination pattern are highly consistent. For example, when throwing a baseball, each person has learned a pattern of relative timing between shifting their body weight over his or her legs, which is timed with respect to rotary, flexion and extension movements of the trunk, shoulder, elbow, etc. The relative timing of each of these parts of the body is quite consistent. Learning how to produce such consistent movement patterns is the process of coordination.

Control
In order to meet task demands these coordination patterns may need to be scaled up or down (such as when throwing a ball closer or farther away). It can also be important to throw a ball accurately with respect to time and location. For example, a catcher in baseball may need to throw the ball to first base while hitting a relatively small target (around the first baseman's glove) within a very short time window. The process of adapting coordination patterns to all these types of task and environmental demands is called control.

Skill
When athletes produce coordination patterns that they can adapt to meet the demands of the task and environment that they have to perform in, this is called skill. Skill may also involve elements such as producing movements that are efficient; that is, producing a high work:energy ratio. Skill may also involve elements such as the ability to produce smooth movements (e.g., 'minimum jerk'). However, in the end, skill is generally defined by the ability to meet some external demands (i.e., being able to beat an opponent).

Physical Education
Understanding the processes of coordination and control to produce skilled action can be important to physical education teachers because this knowledge can help them better assist students. Different types of help and information may be needed to facilitate coordination as opposed to control. Also, during different stages of the learning process either coordination or control may be of more importance. Additionally, the ability to retain and transfer motor learning can be different with respect to coordination and control. Knowing this can enable physical education teachers to better facilitate learning in their students.

In sporting events that involve multiple degrees of freedom, feedback from an instructor regarding performance (kinematic and/or kinetic) will likely be necessary in addition to feedback regarding the results of his or her performance (Newell & Walter, 1981; Newell & McGinnis, 1985; Newell et al., 1985). Different types of augmented information are likely necessary during different stages of the learning process. Information regarding knowledge of performance (KP) is more likely to be beneficial in the early stages of learning (coordination), while knowledge of results (KR) is more beneficial in later stages.

Early in the learning process physical education teachers can provide information to facilitate the process of learning optimal coordination patterns (KP). This type of information may regard what is called moving with good 'form.' While some coordination patterns can be identifiable as being good or bad form, it is also worthwhile to keep in mind that (due to different properties of each person's body and nervous system) what is the optimal coordination pattern for one student may not be optimal for another.

Later in learning the process of control becomes of greater importance, as this involves adapting the already-learned coordination patterns to the task and environmental conditions. For this reason, providing 'knowledge of results' is more likely to be beneficial in later stages of learning as these relate more directly to the process of control.

For example, in the initial stages of learning baseball or softball pitching the learning of body coordination patterns may be more beneficial than would be worrying about accuracy. This represents the learning of coordination, while later focusing on accuracy reflects the process of control, which is best done after some learning of proper coordination patterns has been achieved. Also, the golfer Jack Nicklaus (1974) has recommended having young golfers practice the full golf swing and trying to hit the ball a long way early in the process of learning golf, rather than being concerned with accuracy early on. While Mr. Nicklaus suggested this to promote flexibility, this strategy is also consistent with the need to develop optimal coordination patterns before stressing the scaling and adaptation of these to develop accuracy.

Another relevant factor is the level of skill that is sought by each particular student or athlete. If a moderate level of performance is the goal only a relatively short apprenticeship in coordination may be necessary before moving on to the process of improving control. However, to reach a high level of ability, a more extensive amount of time may need to be spent learning the optimal coordination patterns necessary before moving on to hone the ability to control these patterns.

Retention and Transfer of Motor Learning
Retention of motor learning is the degree to which improvements in performance are kept despite the passage of time, and even layoffs from practice. Research in motor learning has shown that the learning of coordination is better retained than is the scaling of these patterns to meet task demands (i.e., control). This fact may also play a role in the teaching strategy of physical education teachers. For example, if students are going to be having somewhat long periods of time without practice it may be desirable to spend more time on the process of coordination, which will be better retained than practice focusing on control.

It has also been found that the need to warm-up before performing optimally (such as right before a game) affects control more than it does coordination. For this reason, warming up before a competition may better focus on the control and accuracy of movements while not focusing on the coordination patterns to be produced.

Transfer of motor learning is the degree to which performing or learning one task affects performance of another task. Transfer can be positive, negative or neutral, meaning that performing one task might either help or hurt (or have no effect on) one's ability to perform another task.

Research on transfer in motor skills has shown that positive transfer is most commonly associated with control, while negative transfer has generally been found to occur when two tasks involve the use of conflicting coordination patterns. What this means is that it would not be a good idea to have students or athletes perform a task involving a different coordination pattern right before competition (such as playing ping pong right before competing in tennis). However, over the long term this type of negative transfer is unlikely to persist (James & Newell, in press).

Task Constraints
It is important to remember that the processes of coordination and control operate within the context of the constraints of the task (sport) to be performed. For this reason physical educators would be well served to take this into account when teaching motor skills. In some tasks the definition of skill carefully and specifically considers the coordination pattern to be produced.

For example, in diving, dance, and gymnastics the production of certain coordination patterns may largely be the objective of performance, rather than external criteria such as putting a ball through a hoop. In sports such as these an extensive amount of time may likely be needed to ensure the development of the coordination objectives, while there may be much less need to focus on the control of movements.

Other tasks rely minimally on coordination patterns and depend much more on control processes. For example, throwing darts requires the coordination of a relatively small number of body parts in a highly repetitive fashion. In this type of task it would likely be more beneficial to focus on control and accuracy with little concern for coordination.

Summary
The activities and sports taught in physical education classes generally involve multiple degrees of freedom (i.e., the entire body). This being the case, students generally will be using the dual processes of coordination and control to learn skill in these activities. These distinct processes satisfy different requirements for the production of skilled physical activity, and require different types of information for each of these to be learned.

Knowledge of performance regarding movement coordination will likely be more beneficial early on in learning. KR facilitates the control of movements and is likely to be your best bet later on in learning. However, factors such as the demands of the activity being learned, the level of skill that the athlete is seeking to achieve, and how much retention of learning is needed also need to be kept in mind.



REFERENCES


(back to pelinks4u homepage)

pelinks4u sponsors

ATHLETIC STUFF

CTRL WASH UNIVERSITY

EVERLAST CLIMBING INDUSTRIES

GOPHER

LET'S MOVE IN SCHOOL

NASCO

NEW LIFESTYLES

PHI EPSILON KAPPA

SPORTIME

SPEED STACKS

S&S DISCOUNT

TOLEDO PE SUPPLY


articles

contact us
pelinks@pelinks4u.org
Phone: 509-963-2384
Fax 509-963-1989  
 
     
pelinks4u is a non-profit program of Central Washington University dedicated to promoting active and healthy lifestyles
Copyright © 1999-2011 | pelinks4u   All Rights Reserved